[Dune-devel] Possible removal of method ReferenceElement::checkInside<codim>
Martin Nolte
nolte at mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Sun Jul 5 23:09:31 CEST 2015
Hi Oli,
I think we should remain true to our policy on interface changes: Deprecate
before removing. In my opinion, you name a very argument in favor of
deprecation: Nobody will see the warning, so it will annoy nobody.
But personally, I would have voted differently, if 2.4 had not been on our
doorstep. I don't think we should make such aggressive last minute changes.
Moreover, I think Robert is entitled to an opionion on deprecation or not, too.
This is especially so, as his point was overruled.
That said, I stand by democracy. The majority of non-abstained votes is for
throwing out the method now - so be it. However, I guess you have to wait for
the pending answers. They might still change the outcome.
Best,
Martin
On 07/05/2015 10:56 PM, Oliver Sander wrote:
>> unless there is no performance penalty or an disproportional amount
>> of work, I would never remove a feature without deprecation.
>
> But who will see this particular deprecation warning?
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune-devel mailing list
> Dune-devel at dune-project.org
> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel
>
--
Dr. Martin Nolte <nolte at mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
Universität Freiburg phone: +49-761-203-5630
Abteilung für angewandte Mathematik fax: +49-761-203-5632
Hermann-Herder-Straße 10
79104 Freiburg, Germany
More information about the Dune-devel
mailing list