[Dune-devel] DUNE 2.8 release plan: Consider functions, typetree, and uggrid?
Oliver Sander
oliver.sander at tu-dresden.de
Tue Jul 20 08:47:41 CEST 2021
Hi Santiago,
> * For !93, Christian proposed to merge because "it does not change existing code and adds value for the 'under construction' pdelab changes.". But I am also fine discussing it a bit further. @simon, @carsten @oliver Any opinions to this?
I do not have an opinion on this.
If you are not sure about the final interface then maybe a namespace
like 'Impl' or 'Experimental' is a good place?
Best,
Oliver
>
>
> My opinion is that !92 should be in the release, while !93 is just a -nice to have- feature.
>
> Best,
> Santiago
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Dune-devel <dune-devel-bounces at lists.dune-project.org> on behalf of Christoph Grüninger <foss at grueninger.de>
> *Sent:* Monday, July 19, 2021 8:39:02 AM
> *To:* dune-devel at lists.dune-project.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Dune-devel] DUNE 2.8 release plan: Consider functions, typetree, and uggrid?
> Hi Christian,
> hi Santiago,
>
> what is the status regarding your MR? Can I branch or should I wait a
> little bit longer?
>
> Bye
> Christoph
>
> Am 09.07.21 um 16:44 schrieb Christian Engwer:
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> Yesterday I met with Santiago and we went through a couple of changes.
>> There are some small last things I want to check, yes you are right,
>> there are still some MRs that should ideally be merged before 2.8.
>>
>> Ciao
>> Christian
>>
>> Am 9. Juli 2021 16:20:33 MESZ schrieb "Christoph Grüninger"
>> <foss at grueninger.de>:
>>
>> Hi Carsten,
>> hi Oliver,
>> hi Christian,
>>
>> Markus and I, we are preparing the Dune 2.8 release for the core
>> modules. Should we also do dune-typetree, dune-functions, and
>> dune-uggrid, similar as I did for Dune 2.7?
>>
>> I am under the impression, that you might want to merge stuff prior to
>> the branching:
>> typtree:
>> !92 Add tree transformation to dynamic power nodes
>> !93 Resolve "TreeInfo interface is not suitable for dynamic nodes"
>> functions:
>> !300: fix some minor issues which clang++11 complains about
>> !278: [WIP] Provide test and fix for interpolation of general vector
>> valued functions
>>
>> It's kind of sad, that we were not able to merge typetree into common.
>> Maybe this can happen after Dune 2.8.
>>
>> Bye
>> Christoph
>>
>> Am 24.06.21 um 11:42 schrieb Markus Blatt:
>>
>> Dear users and developers,
>>
>>
>> we will be preparing a DUNE 2.8 release this summer. I will be
>> the release
>> manager and Christoph plans to help me with this task. The current
>> tentative schedule for the release is as follows:
>>
>> 2021-07-09 (evening): Creation of release branches. From that
>> time on only
>> bugfixes or very important features will be backported to the
>> release branches.
>> 2021-07-16 (evening): Feature freeze. Only bug fixes will be
>> backported and
>> accepted to the release branches
>> 2021-07-19: First release candidate. This and further candidates
>> will be
>> announced on the DUNE mailing lists.
>>
>> Final release is planned for 2021-07-30, but that should be
>> treated as a
>> rather soft date. We will release once release candidates have
>> been tested
>> and we have not received any further bug reports.
>>
>> As always we appreciate your help with testing and backported.
>> Please
>> always
>> keep in mind that saying "I tested and found no issues" is
>> always better
>> than
>> not reporting back in this case.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Markus
>>
>
> --
> Als wär es nix, leb' ich von [IT] und mach' nur, was ich lieb'
> Lebe wie im Paradies, womit hab' ich das verdient?
> Die Wahrheit ist: Hab' ich nicht, ich bin nur reicher beschenkt
> Als jemand in einem armen Land mit dem gleichen Talent
> [frei nach Tua von Die Orsons - Oioioiropa]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune-devel mailing list
> Dune-devel at lists.dune-project.org
> https://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel <https://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune-devel mailing list
> Dune-devel at lists.dune-project.org
> https://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5198 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.dune-project.org/pipermail/dune-devel/attachments/20210720/eee6c6cb/attachment.bin>
More information about the Dune-devel
mailing list