<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<div>
<div>I don't care either way. </div>
<div>Andreas </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size:10px; color:#575757">Sent from Samsung Mobile</div>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: Oliver Sander </div>
<div>Date:20/02/2014 20:55 (GMT+00:00) </div>
<div>To: dune-devel@dune-project.org </div>
<div>Subject: Re: [Dune-devel] Public interface of GridView </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">So, let's phrase this another way: are there any objections to making<br>
the type and constructor protected?<br>
--<br>
Oliver<br>
<br>
Am 19.02.2014 14:32, schrieb Oliver Sander:<br>
> Dear Dune developers,<br>
> I have been looking at the interface of the GridView class, and I have noticed that<br>
> it publicly exports its implementation type GridViewImp. Also, there is a public<br>
> constructor from a GridViewImp. Is that intentional? Usually we try to hide these<br>
> implementation classes from the normal user. Shouldn't the type & constructor be protected<br>
> instead?<br>
> --<br>
> Oliver<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Dune-devel mailing list<br>
> Dune-devel@dune-project.org<br>
> <a href="http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel">http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-devel</a><br>
> <br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>