[dune-fem] StandardArrayAllocator vs. CArrayAllocator

[Rene Milk]

On 11/13/2013 01:21 PM, Tobias Malkmus wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 12:40 PM, Rene Milk wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I've discovered that using StandardArrayAllocator as the
>> DefaultArrayAllocator's base causes a stack corruption after
>> DynamicVector's append/resize when my application is compiled with
>> -fopenmp. Using CArrayAllocator this corruption does not happen. I'm
>> wondering if a) someone else has seen an effect like this before and b)
>> there are arguments against using CArrayAllocator.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rene
>>
> 
> Hi Rene
> 
> Do you have a small test which causes this problems ?
> 
> Best Tobias
> 
> 

Sadly, I don't. The application is somewhat complex. There's also
non-public repositories involved I think.

-- 
--------------------------------------------------
 Dipl.-Math. Rene Milk
 University of Münster
 Institute for Applied Mathematics
 Orleans-Ring 10, R. 120.012
 48149 Münster               Tel. +49 251 83-35131
 Germany
--------------------------------------------------