[Dune] [#801] Int2Type vs. integral_constant
Dune
flyspray at dune-project.org
Tue Aug 24 18:28:16 CEST 2010
THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
The following task has a new comment added:
FS#801 - Int2Type vs. integral_constant
User who did this - Robert Klöfkorn (robertk)
----------
> integral_constant is more flexible and part of the c++0x standard
I would mark Int2Type as deprecated first, before removing anything. We are using this a lot.
I don't see any benefit for a change right now. Furthermore, since when is gcc support c++0x.
We might get in trouble with wolder compiler (or non-gnu) version.
So, I support to use integral_constant but I would also like to kepp Int2Type for a little bit longer.
----------
More information can be found at the following URL:
http://www.dune-project.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=801#comment2118
You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system. If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.
More information about the Dune
mailing list