[Dune] Building dune 2.1

[Oliver Sander]

Thanks, Markus.

Still I think it unfortunate that technology requires us to release
all other core modules, too.  I suppose there is no easy way around
this (cmake aside)?  What happens to third-party module releases,
like dune-fem?  Does dune-fem have to do a third-digit-release, too,
because we updated the dune-common tarball?

--
Oliver

Am 03.01.2012 12:28, schrieb Dedner, Andreas:
> I also agree - and thank you Markus.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dune-bounces+a.s.dedner=warwick.ac.uk at dune-project.org on behalf
> of Markus Blatt
> Sent: Tue 1/3/2012 11:18 AM
> To: dune at dune-project.org
> Cc: Andreas Lauser; Christian Engwer
> Subject: Re: [Dune] Building dune 2.1
>
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 12:08:46PM +0100, Christian Engwer wrote:
>>  I agree... the core modules should have a consistent numbering. We
>>  provide them as a package. If I remember correctly, we even dicussed
>>  this question some year ago on a dev.meeting and decided exactly this
>>  policy. I remember that we once had a bug-fix release where only
>>  dune-grid was changed, but we released new tarballs for all core modules.
>>
>
> I agree and am volunteering to build the other tarballs and upload
> them.
>
> Markus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune mailing list
> Dune at dune-project.org
> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune mailing list
> Dune at dune-project.org
> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune