[Dune] [#970] Unify typedefs -- XyzType vs. Xyz

[Dune]

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.

The following task has a new comment added:

FS#970 - Unify typedefs -- XyzType vs. Xyz
User who did this - Markus Blatt (mblatt)

----------
Somehow I was always under the impression that there is an implicite convention for XyzType. Maybe that is because in the stl it is xyz_type which converted to CamelCase is XyzType IMHO. It is clear that the stl needs this to allow 

size_type size;

which we do not need if we stick to CamelCase.

Personally, I do not care about the convention, but there should be one. 

Probably going from XyzType to is easier as this can be automated. But it still might break Code:

- if the typedef has the same name as the enclosing class.
- if a variable has the same name as the typedef

Maybe the decision of the naming convention should actually be done rather by the users thn by the developers. Therefore I propose a vote between the users.
----------

More information can be found at the following URL:
http://www.dune-project.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&task_id=970#comment3714

You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the Flyspray bugtracking system.  If you did not expect this message or don't want to receive mails in future, you can change your notification settings at the URL shown above.