[Dune-devel] [GSoC2016] Application answers review

[Christoph Grüninger]

Hi Markus,
if you have improvements, please feel free to edit the answers. But make
sure they don't exceed the limit (I tried to mention the allwowed length
of the answers).
I will check the history and if I don't agree with changes, I start a
discussion. I hope other interested developers will act the same.

> Did the questions change?

Some stayed the same, some changed. Overall I felt the new questions are
better.

> I think some of the answers are really bad (I guess that is my
> fault).

They get slightly modified every year.

> We had students that nearly failed midterm in 2013 and
> got them back on track due to good mentoring. We should mention that.
> Additionally we should not emphasize being academics so much. I don't
> think that this is a selling point. Instead we might point out the experiences
> and actions we took in 2013.

Good idea.

Bye
Christoph

-- 
The method has been developed for use on a high-speed electronic
computer and would be impractical for hand-solution purposes.
                                           [Harlow & Welch 1965]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.dune-project.org/pipermail/dune-devel/attachments/20160217/64013fd6/attachment.sig>