[Dune-devel] Request about the /usr/bin/dune filename
Anil Madhavapeddy
anil at recoil.org
Tue Jan 22 15:20:36 CET 2019
Dear Andreas, Oliver,
Thanks very much for this; we really appreciate it from OCaml. Let us know if there’s anything we can do from our end to ensure there is no confusion about our use of /usr/bin/dune and your /usr/bin/duneproject invocations for your build system.
best,
Anil
> On 22 Jan 2019, at 12:02, Dedner, Andreas <A.S.Dedner at warwick.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I'm fine with this as well
> Andreas
> From: Dune-devel <dune-devel-bounces at lists.dune-project.org> on behalf of Oliver Sander <oliver.sander at tu-dresden.de>
> Sent: 22 January 2019 11:45:42
> To: dune-devel at lists.dune-project.org; anil at recoil.org; jeremie at dimino.org
> Subject: Re: [Dune-devel] Request about the /usr/bin/dune filename
>
> > I tend to agree with Ansgar here. Unless one of the other developers comes up
> > with a good reason why we should reserve those names.
>
> I don't see us needing those names in the nearer future. As far as I am concerned
> we can give them up.
>
> > I do find it unfortunate however that this clash has to happen with a
> > buildsystem -- after all, everything we provide under /usr/bin has to do with
> > our buildsystem. There is a good chance of confusion as to which buildsystem
> > exactly /usr/bin/duneproject will create a skeleton project for.
>
> <humour> ... unless we rewrite our code to use ocaml and the dune build system</humour>
>
> --
> Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dune-project.org/pipermail/dune-devel/attachments/20190122/da0bf388/attachment.htm>
More information about the Dune-devel
mailing list