[Dune-devel] Rights for Samuel Barbulla
Dedner, Andreas
A.S.Dedner at warwick.ac.uk
Wed Jan 26 21:57:07 CET 2022
sponsoring
That was the word I was looking for 🙂
The core developer question can be discussed at the meeting. It been some time: do we need all core developers to respond and can this be done 'auf dem kleinen Dienstweg' (google translate: 'on the small official route' )?
Btw: can I grant access myself - I couldn't figure out where I would do that.
Andreas
________________________________
From: Christian Engwer <christian.engwer at uni-muenster.de>
Sent: 26 January 2022 20:38
To: Dedner, Andreas <A.S.Dedner at warwick.ac.uk>
Cc: dune-devel at lists.dune-project.org <dune-devel at lists.dune-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Dune-devel] Rights for Samuel Barbulla
Am Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 04:51:35PM +0000 schrieb Dedner, Andreas:
> Hi.
> I would like for Samuel Barbulla to get access to the core repository (I should have suggested that ages ago).
> I'm happy to vouch for him (or whatever I need to do).
>
> In fact, I would like to suggest for him to get developer status at some point since he has greatly helped with the Python bindings and packaging and is also very familiar with the grid interface (having implemented a new grid himself)
> https://gitlab.dune-project.org/samuel.burbulla/dune-mmesh
> Having more core developers active in this area would be helpful. But I can understand if that should perhaps be postponed for a bit.
As you are sponsoring Samuel, there should be no problem granting write access (as we handled it always...)
Regarding a future "core" status, I don't think we should discuss this now via email.
Best
Christian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dune-project.org/pipermail/dune-devel/attachments/20220126/53e95c8e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Dune-devel
mailing list