[dune-pdelab] dune-pdelab | feature/clean-up-cde-lop (#30)

[Steffen Müthing]

Hi Christian,

> Am 02.07.2015 um 21:14 schrieb Christian Engwer <christian.engwer at uni-muenster.de>:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> even worse.
> 
> Adrian & Steffen... the branch wasn't updated accoring to the
> discussion we had before, in particular the new discrete functions are
> add in localoperator, without _any_ namespace. Neither Dune, nor
> Dune::PDELab, nor Dune::PDELab::experimental (as is seemed to be the
> solution with the biggest support).
> 
> Honestly I feel a strong to just revert the merge, but I'm holding
> myself back.

sorry, I should have communicated this, but I’m extremely busy with a paper right now. The problem
is that the number of changes that was decided after this branch was started just kept growing (reorganize
include structure, move stuff into namespaces etc.), and splitting everything out would have become very
time-consuming. So I merged the branch and discussed how to proceed with Adrian. He will clean up the
problems with the branch in a number of future branches, which will be smaller and more focused. At the
same time, we now have all of the invasive branches w.r.t. localoperator/ merged, which makes it possible
to start the reorganization of the header files into the new problem/* directories.

Basically, having this monster branch looming around held further development back too much, and we will
clean up after merging it. I know that that’s not how it’s supposed to work, but I consider it part of the learning
curve…

Steffen

> 
> Christian
> 
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:03:18PM +0200, Christian Engwer wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:45:53PM +0000, Steffen Müthing wrote:
>>> Merge Request #30 was merged
>>> Merge Request Url: http://conan2.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/git/pdelab/dune-pdelab/merge_requests/30
>>> Branches: feature/clean-up-CDE-LOP to master
>>> Author: Adrian Ngo
>>> Assignee: Steffen Müthing
>> 
>> I'm not happy with what happend in the context of this branch.
>> 
>> It contradicts the workflow we are trying to achieve as it is growing
>> too large and it we started a discussion on this.
>> 
>> @Steffen: if you and Adrian discussed this in Heidelberg and had good
>> reason to merge despite the open questions, you should communicate
>> it. Merging this branch without a reply to the critique is not the we
>> should collaborate.
>> 
>> Please keep in mind, that PDELab isn't a Heidelberg only project and a
>> couple of people are trying to participate. Thus transparency is imho
>> crutial.
>> 
>> Christian
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dune-pdelab mailing list
>> dune-pdelab at dune-project.org
>> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-pdelab
>> 
> 
> --
> Prof. Dr. Christian Engwer
> Institut für Numerische und Angewandte Mathematik
> Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Universität Münster
> Einsteinstrasse 62
> 48149 Münster
> 
> E-Mail	christian.engwer at uni-muenster.de
> Telefon	+49 251 83-35067
> FAX		+49 251 83-32729
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dune-pdelab mailing list
> dune-pdelab at dune-project.org
> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune-pdelab
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.dune-project.org/pipermail/dune-pdelab/attachments/20150703/fe3c3b88/attachment.sig>