[Dune] boundary id
Andreas Dedner
dedner at mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Tue Dec 12 10:45:27 CET 2006
Hi,
my view of boundary and domain ids:
1) at the moment domain ids defined for entiy 0 can be easily handle
using discrete functions since suitable mappers and iterators are
available so that I would suggest to keep everything as is in this
repect for 1.0
2) boundary ids are a bit different since we have no iterators and
no index sets for boundaries - in fact no concept of boundaries in
Dune. It would be nice to at least be able to identify boundaries
without having to rely on world coordinate information. This is
why we introduce boundaryIDs for the boundary intersection. The
semantics is - as I understand it:
For each boundary intersection on the macro grid we can define an
id (>0?). During refinement we have: if a boundary intersection I
lies in a boundary intersection I_0 then it has the same boundary id
as id...
Alberta/Alu work exactly in this way and the DGF parser can handle this
approach as well. YaspGrid only assignes ID for each whole face of the
domain. UG only returns a 1.
Andreas
Oliver Sander wrote:
> Hi Andreas!
> I would say that this is a definite post-1.0 feature. In fact,
> looking at the documentation of boundaryId I don't quite understand
> what it is supposed to do precisely. Hence I can't tell how
> difficult it would be to build that feature in UGGrid.
>
> Cheers,
> Oliver
>
> ************************************************************************
> * Oliver Sander ** email: sander at mi.fu-berlin.de *
> * Freie Universität Berlin ** phone: + 49 (30) 838 75217 *
> * Institut für Mathematik II ** URL : page.mi.fu-berlin.de/~sander *
> * Arnimallee 6 ** -------------------------------------*
> * 14195 Berlin, Germany ** Member of MATHEON (www.matheon.de) *
> ************************************************************************
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:30:13 +0100
> From: Andreas Dedner <dedner at mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
> To: Oliver Sander <sander at mi.fu-berlin.de>
> Subject: boundary id
>
> Hallo Oliver,
>
> ich wollte nachfragen, wie schwierig es jetzt noch waere
> die boundary ids in UG einzubauen. Du hattest irgentwann
> makl gesagt, so ein Konzept gaebs in UG ohnehin...
> Gruss Andreas
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune mailing list
> Dune at dune-project.org
> http://www.dune-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dune
More information about the Dune
mailing list