[Dune] Notification from Dune

Andreas Dedner dedner at mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Mon Feb 12 10:25:28 CET 2007


My suggestion was in favour of removing it sincve it only
causes confussion if there really is no difference.
Removing the difference in the code in one go might
cause some difficult to foresee trouble which I
wanted to avoid for 1.0.



Flyspray wrote:
> THIS IS AN AUTOMATED MESSAGE, DO NOT REPLY.
> 
> The following task has a new comment added:
> 
> FS#260 - Specialization Entity<dim,dim> obsolete
> User who did this: - Oliver Sander (sander)
> 
> ----------
> I disagree.  Either we think removing the specialization is fine. 
> Then we may as well remove it along with its documentation.  If we
> have doubts we should keep it.  But then we should also keep the
> documentation.  If there really are subtle differences between the
> behaviour of the specialized and the unspecialized class there needs
> to be a complete documentation.
> ----------
> 
> More information can be found at the following URL:
> http://hal.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/flyspray/?do=details&id=260#comment256
> 
> You are receiving this message because you have requested it from the
> Flyspray bugtracking system.  You can be removed from future
> notifications by visiting the URL shown above.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dune mailing list
> Dune at dune-project.org
> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune




More information about the Dune mailing list