[Dune] Fwd: Re: [Dune-Commit] dune-common r6512 - trunk/dune/common
Martin Nolte
nolte at mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
Fri Oct 14 13:13:10 CEST 2011
Maybe we can invent an official form for such things ;-).
At least I don't have time for this amount of beaurocracy.
Best,
Martin
On 10/14/2011 11:24 AM, Oliver Sander wrote:
> I agree with Markus in considering the change an interface change.
> Therefore a little announcement or RFC before the commit would have
> been nice. I actually do think that the change could be quite
> helpful. Still, changing the interface without a RFC before is not
> how Dune development should work.
>
> best,
> Oliver
>
> Am 14.10.2011 12:17, schrieb Markus Blatt:
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:55:11AM +0100, Martin Nolte wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I do not consider this an interface change, since all existing codes
>>> will keep working unless you define row_reference to something other
>>> than row_type&.
>>
>> Changing the signature of a function is IMHO an interface change even
>> if it might change only future code.
>>
>>> And I do not intend to do such a thing to the
>>> FieldMatrix, which is indeed so deeply in the core of DUNE that such a
>>> change is nearly impossible.
>>>
>>> The reason for the change is to allow containers that store all values
>>> in a single array (e.g., a FieldVector). If you do this, the row has to
>>> be a dummy object that cannot be referenced (in the standard C++ sense).
>>> However, all required information is so small that you can actually
>>> store it in the reference itself, once this is allowed to be an object.
>>>
>>
>> And one someone uses that container instead of FieldMatrix things
>> might break and without this discussion it would be hard to find.
>>
>>> So, if you feel like voting on this, go ahead and create a FlySpray
>>> entry on this. My vote is clear.
>>
>> I didn't even call for a vote. My only concern is to raise attention
>> of developers and users before such changes. That would have been
>> nice, would it not?
>>
>> The only still unanswered question is: Who will change all occurrences
>> of row_type& to row__reference and so on in the code to prevent
>> future code breakage?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Markus
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dune mailing list
>> Dune at dune-project.org
>> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dune mailing list
> Dune at dune-project.org
> http://lists.dune-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dune
More information about the Dune
mailing list